Download File ⚹ https://urllio.com/2v06Eh

Wanchoo Committee Report On Telangana Pdf Download

The Wanchoo Committee Report is a document that was prepared by a committee of jurists headed by former Supreme Court Chief Justice K.N. Wanchoo in 1969. The committee was appointed by the Government of India to consider the implications of the Supreme Court judgment that struck down the Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act, 1957, insofar as it related to the Telangana area of Andhra Pradesh. The committee was also tasked with suggesting suitable measures, including legislative measures, to provide appropriate constitutional safeguards in the matter of public employment or appointment for people belonging to the Telengana area of Andhra Pradesh, in keeping with the spirit of the assurances contained in the Agreement reached between the Andhra and Telengana leaders in 1956 and the recent All Party Accord reached at Hyderabad on 19th January, 1969.

The Wanchoo Committee Report was submitted in August 1969 and it contained several recommendations to ensure the protection of the interests of the Telengana people in public services. The committee stated that the constitution cannot be amended to implement the Mulki rules, which were a set of rules that required a person to be a resident of Hyderabad State for at least 15 years to be eligible for public employment, because of the judgment given by the Supreme Court in the Golaknath case which did not allow any amendment to Article 16. The committee suggested that instead of amending the constitution, a Presidential Order under Article 371-D could be issued to provide for reservation of posts in favour of local candidates in public services and educational institutions in Telengana. The committee also recommended that a statutory body should be set up to monitor and review the implementation of these safeguards.

The Wanchoo Committee Report was a significant document that addressed the grievances and aspirations of the Telengana people who were demanding a separate state from Andhra Pradesh. The report was accepted by the Government of India and a Presidential Order under Article 371-D was issued in 1975. However, the report was not fully implemented and many issues remained unresolved. The Telengana movement continued and gained momentum in the subsequent decades until finally a separate state of Telangana was formed in 2014.

If you are interested in reading more about the Wanchoo Committee Report and its recommendations, you can download it in PDF format from this link: https://dspace.gipe.ac.in/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10973/52062/GIPE-129758.pdf?sequence=1. This is a scanned copy of the original report that was published by the Government of India Ministry of Home Affairs in 1969.

The Wanchoo Committee Report was not well received by the people of Telangana who felt that it did not address their core demands of a separate state and full implementation of the Mulki rules. The report also faced opposition from the people of Andhra who feared that it would create a regional imbalance and affect their interests in public services and education. The report sparked off a series of protests and agitations in both regions, leading to violence and loss of lives.

The Telangana agitation of 1969 was one of the most intense and prolonged movements for statehood in India. It was led by students, employees, political parties and civil society groups who demanded the creation of a separate Telangana state with Hyderabad as its capital. The agitation was triggered by the dissatisfaction over the implementation of the Gentlemen’s agreement and the All Party Accord that were supposed to safeguard the interests of Telangana in terms of development, revenue, employment and education. The agitation also reflected the cultural and linguistic identity of the Telangana people who felt alienated from the dominant Andhra culture and politics.

The Telangana agitation of 1969 witnessed several forms of protest such as rallies, marches, strikes, boycotts, hunger strikes, self-immolations and violent clashes with the police and paramilitary forces. The agitation also saw the emergence of new leaders and organisations such as the Telangana Praja Samithi (TPS), which became the main political voice of the movement. The agitation also influenced the literary and cultural scene of Telangana, as many poets, writers, artists and singers expressed their solidarity and support for the cause through their works.

The Telangana agitation of 1969 did not achieve its goal of a separate state, but it did create a strong sense of identity and aspiration among the Telangana people. The movement also influenced the political landscape of Andhra Pradesh, as the Telangana Praja Samithi emerged as a major force in the 1971 elections, winning 10 out of 14 Lok Sabha seats and 11 out of 32 Assembly seats in Telangana. However, the TPS soon lost its momentum and merged with the Congress in 1972, under the leadership of Marri Chenna Reddy, who became the chief minister of Andhra Pradesh.

The demand for a separate Telangana state was revived in the late 1990s and early 2000s by the Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS), a regional party founded by K. Chandrashekar Rao (KCR) in 2001. The TRS allied with various national and regional parties at different times to press for its demand. The TRS also launched several agitations, such as hunger strikes, rail rokos, bandhs and rallies, to mobilise public support for Telangana. The TRS also participated in the first Telangana Joint Action Committee (TJAC), which was formed in 2009 by various political and civil society groups to coordinate the Telangana movement.

The Telangana movement reached its climax in December 2009, when KCR went on an indefinite hunger strike demanding a separate state. His fast triggered a massive wave of protests and violence across Telangana, forcing the then Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram to announce on 9 December 2009 that the process of forming a separate Telangana state would be initiated. However, this announcement was met with strong opposition from the leaders and people of Andhra and Rayalaseema regions, who launched counter-agitations demanding a united Andhra Pradesh. The Centre then put the Telangana issue on hold and appointed a five-member committee headed by former Supreme Court judge B.N. Srikrishna to look into the matter.

The Srikrishna Committee submitted its report on 30 December 2010 to the Home Ministry, after consulting various stakeholders and examining various aspects of the Telangana issue. The committee gave six possible options for the future of Andhra Pradesh, along with their pros and cons. The options were:

Keeping the state united by providing constitutional and statutory measures for socio-economic development and political empowerment of Telangana region.
Bifurcating the state into Telangana and Seemandhra as per existing boundaries, with Hyderabad as the capital of Telangana and Seemandhra to have a new capital.
Bifurcating the state into Telangana and Seemandhra as per existing boundaries, with Hyderabad as a union territory and as the joint capital of both states for a fixed period of time.
Bifurcating the state into Telangana and Seemandhra as per existing boundaries, with Hyderabad as the capital of Telangana and Seemandhra to have a new capital in Rayalaseema region.
Bifurcating the state into Rayala-Telangana and Coastal Andhra regions along with some districts of Rayalaseema being transferred to Telangana.
Bifurcating the state into two states of Telangana and Coastal Andhra with enlarged Hyderabad Metropolis as a separate union territory.

The committee stated that none of these options can be said to be ideal or perfect, and each one has its own advantages and disadvantages. The committee also stated that any decision on the Telangana issue should be taken by consensus among all parties and groups concerned, and should be acceptable to the majority of the people in all regions. The committee recommended that option one, i.e., keeping the state united with constitutional safeguards for Telangana, was the most workable solution in the given circumstances. The committee also suggested that option two, i.e., bifurcating the state into two states of Telangana and Seemandhra, could be considered as a second best alternative if option one was not acceptable to all parties.

The Srikrishna Committee report did not satisfy the Telangana supporters, who rejected all options except option two, i.e., bifurcation of the state into two states of Telangana and Seemandhra. The report also faced criticism from the pro-united Andhra groups, who opposed any division of the state. The report was seen as ambiguous and inconclusive by both sides, and failed to resolve the Telangana issue. The report also sparked off fresh protests and agitations in both regions, leading to disruption of normal life and public services.

The Telangana statehood movement continued with renewed vigour and intensity from 2011 to 2014, under the leadership of the TRS and the TJAC. The movement also received support from various political parties, such as BJP, CPI, CPI(M), MIM and YSRCP, at different times. The movement also witnessed the participation of various sections of society, such as students, employees, teachers, lawyers, doctors, farmers, women and cultural activists. The movement also used various forms of protest, such as rallies, marches, strikes, boycotts, hunger strikes, self-immolations and suicides.

The Telangana movement reached its climax in 2013-2014, when the Congress Working Committee (CWC) passed a resolution on 30 July 2013 to recommend the formation of a separate Telangana state. The resolution was followed by the approval of the Union Cabinet on 3 October 2013 and the introduction of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Bill in the Parliament on 5 December 2013. The bill faced stiff opposition from the Seemandhra MPs and MLAs, who disrupted the proceedings of both houses of Parliament and staged protests inside and outside the Parliament. The bill was finally passed by both houses of Parliament in February 2014 amid chaos and controversy.

Conclusion

The Telangana issue is one of the most complex and contentious issues in the history of Indian federalism. It involves multiple dimensions, such as historical, cultural, linguistic, economic, political and constitutional. The issue has been a source of conflict and controversy for over six decades, and has witnessed several phases of agitation and negotiation. The issue has also affected the lives and livelihoods of millions of people in both regions of Andhra Pradesh.

The formation of Telangana state on 2 June 2014 was the culmination of a long and arduous struggle by the Telangana people for their identity and rights. It was also the result of a political consensus among various parties and groups at the national and state level. The formation of Telangana state was hailed as a victory for democracy and federalism by its supporters, and as a loss for unity and development by its opponents. The formation of Telangana state also raised hopes and expectations among the Telangana people for a better future, and also posed challenges and responsibilities for the new government and administration.

The Wanchoo Committee Report on Telangana was one of the key documents that shaped the course of the Telangana movement. The report was prepared by a committee of jurists in 1969 to address the grievances and aspirations of the Telangana people in public employment and education. The report suggested constitutional and statutory measures to safeguard the interests of Telangana region within a united Andhra Pradesh. The report was accepted by the central government, but not fully implemented. The report also sparked off protests and agitations in both regions, leading to violence and loss of lives. The report was a significant document that reflected the complexity and sensitivity of the Telangana issue.

The Wanchoo Committee Report on Telangana is available for download in PDF format from this link: https://dspace.gipe.ac.in/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10973/52062/GIPE-129758.pdf?sequence=1. This is a scanned copy of the original report that was published by the Government of India Ministry of Home Affairs in 1969.

86646a7979